The recent meeting of the foreign ministers of the Quad nations — the United States, India, Japan, and Australia — in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack raised hope that the grouping would take a firm stand against terrorism. While there was a collective call to bring perpetrators to justice, what stood out was the conspicuous absence of Pakistan’s name — the country widely believed to be the breeding ground of the attackers. It is disappointing that despite the gravity of the attack in which 26 Hindu pilgrims lost their lives, the Quad statement avoided directly naming Pakistan. This omission raises serious concerns. Is Pakistan being shielded due to strategic or geopolitical considerations? Is it because of its military alliance with powerful nations or its perceived role in balancing regional dynamics? Whatever the reason, the failure to call out a known sponsor of terrorism undermines the credibility of the Quad’s anti-terror stance. The duplicity of American policy is glaring. While India undertook Operation Sindhura in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack, the US response remained muted. Instead, American President Donald Trump was seen praising Pakistan and its military leadership. This contradictory behavior sends mixed signals and exposes the United States’ double standards when it comes to dealing with terrorism, particularly when its strategic interests are involved. India must tread carefully in its engagement with the Quad, especially under leaders like President Trump whose policies lack consistency. New Delhi must also persistently remind the Quad of its original intent — to uphold peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and to act firmly against terrorism. The grouping must align its actions with its foundational objectives and prioritize the collective interests of its member nations over short-term diplomatic convenience. As the next Quad Summit approaches, India should proactively prepare its stance. It must also strengthen its engagement with other global platforms like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), BRICS, and ASEAN, ensuring its interests are well represented and protected. In the realm of international diplomacy, concern for global peace must not overshadow national interests. India’s increasing assertiveness in global affairs in recent times is a positive sign. It must remain vigilant and continue exposing the double standards of powers like the US and China when it comes to terrorism. Only then can India hope to influence global opinion and shape a truly just international order.
